From 1ba068b8565af275ddbfdb78acb4125f58909384 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lonnie Webster Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 10:06:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Add Is there such a Factor as A Photographic Memory? --- Is-there-such-a-Factor-as-A-Photographic-Memory%3F.md | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Is-there-such-a-Factor-as-A-Photographic-Memory%3F.md diff --git a/Is-there-such-a-Factor-as-A-Photographic-Memory%3F.md b/Is-there-such-a-Factor-as-A-Photographic-Memory%3F.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2d8d31a --- /dev/null +++ b/Is-there-such-a-Factor-as-A-Photographic-Memory%3F.md @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +
Is there such a thing as a photographic memory? And if so, can or not it's learned? Alan Searleman, a professor of psychology at St. Lawrence University and co-writer of the school textbook Memory from a Broader Perspective, explains. In the scientific literature, the time period eidetic imagery comes closest to what's popularly known as photographic memory. The most typical approach to identify eidetikers (as people with eidetic imagery are often known as) is by the picture Elicitation Technique. In it, an unfamiliar image is placed on an easel and a person carefully scans the entire scene. After 30 seconds have elapsed, the image is removed from view, and the individual is asked to continue to look at the easel and to report something that they can observe. Folks possessing eidetic imagery will confidently declare to still "see" the image. In addition, they'll scan it and examine completely different parts of it simply as if the picture had been nonetheless bodily present.
+ +
Consequently, one of many hallmarks of eidetic imagery is that eidetikers use the current tense when answering questions about the lacking picture, and they'll report in extraordinary detail what it contained. Eidetic photos differ from other types of visible imagery in a number of important ways. First, an eidetic picture isn't simply an extended afterimage, since afterimages transfer round when you progress your eyes and are usually a distinct coloration than the original image. In contrast, a real eidetic image doesn¿t transfer as you move your eyes, and it is in the same color as the unique image. Second, a common visual image that we can all create from memory (similar to a picture of a bedroom) doesn't have the traits of most eidetic photos, which nearly all the time fade away involuntarily and half by half. Additionally, it isn't possible to manage which parts of an eidetic picture fade and which stay visible. Not like common visual pictures created from [Memory Wave App](https://www.yewiki.org/Dynamic_Memory_Compression), most eidetic photographs last between about half a minute to several minutes solely, and it is possible to voluntarily destroy an eidetic image without end by the straightforward act of blinking deliberately.
+ +
Moreover, [Memory Wave App](http://torrdan.net:80/index.php?title=Rent_A_Photograph_Booth) once gone from view, rarely can an eidetic image ever be retrieved. If you're having fun with this article, consider supporting our award-successful journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you're serving to to ensure the way forward for impactful tales in regards to the discoveries and ideas shaping our world right this moment. You might count on that an individual who claims to nonetheless see a picture after it has been eliminated would be capable of have an ideal memory of the original picture. In spite of everything, an ideal memory is what's usually implied by the generally used phrase "photographic memory." As it turns out, however, the accuracy of many eidetic photographs is removed from excellent. Actually, moreover usually being sketchy on some particulars, it is not unusual for eidetikers to alter visible particulars and even to invent some that had been never in the unique. This suggests that eidetic photographs are definitely not [photographic](https://ajt-ventures.com/?s=photographic) in nature however instead are reconstructed from memory and may be influenced like other reminiscences (each visible and nonvisual) by cognitive biases and expectations.
+ +
The overwhelming majority of the people who've been identified as possessing eidetic imagery are kids. The prevalence estimates of the flexibility among preadolescents vary from about 2 % to 10 percent. And it's an equal-opportunity phenomenon--there¿s no gender distinction in who's more likely to be an eidetiker. Although it is definitely controversial, some researchers additionally imagine that eidetic imagery occurs extra continuously in certain populations of the mentally retarded (particularly, in people whose retardation most likely stems from biological, somewhat than environmental, causes) and likewise among geriatric populations. With a number of notable exceptions, nonetheless, most research has shown that nearly no adults appear to own the flexibility to form eidetic pictures. Why ought to this be so? Nobody actually knows, though part of the reply could also be related to a relatively obscure fact about the development of such pictures. Analysis has shown that if a person verbalizes throughout the time she or he is scanning the unique picture, this interferes with eidetic picture formation.
\ No newline at end of file